|
||||
|
About our Courses | Short Words | About Us | Browse Booklists | Ask Questions | Gripes and Groans
|
||||
|
This article
appeared in the Autumn 1996 edition of Short
Words, the newsletter of Tim Albert Training.
It was written by Tim Albert. |
A good writing style: what exactly is it?
Ask most people for a definition of style and they will come up with words such as 'flowing and readable' ... 'witty and elegant' ... 'amusing and sharp' ... 'enjoyable and satisfying'. Which is fine, up to a point. We can hardly disagree with such words, but they don't really help us when, for instance, we want to know whether to choose one word over another. This brings us to guidelines and rules. Over the past 100 years many excellent writers on writing have given us many pieces of sensible advice, such as:
The main difficulty here is that such guidelines may be commonly promulgated, but they are equally commonly ignored. Look in any medical journal, for instance, and the sentences will be long, constructions passive, and short words conspicuous by their absence (though not clichés). A 'good style' for this market will have little in common with the 'good style' as seen by Orwell or Strunk and White. This leads us to the only plausible resolution: a good writing style becomes the choice of words and grammatical constructions that are most likely to get the message across to the target audience. Style becomes a means to an end and not a measure of
personality or education. Its importance lies in what it
allows us to say to other people rather than what it says
about us. Once we stop trying to impress, and concentrate on
putting across what we want to say, we might end up with
something with literary merit after all. What others say
|
|||
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
||||