|
||||
|
About our Courses | Short Words | About Us | Browse Booklists | Ask Questions | Gripes and Groans
|
||||
|
|
Revise? I'd rather cry! Why does medical writing
attract humiliation? In other activities and in other walks of life, usually we are encouraged to be positive to people who are brave enough to have a go. But when it comes to putting things down in black and white, we are too quick to get out the red pencil. For instance, as soon as the first author has finished the first draft of a scientific article, all the other co-authors try to show up his or her inadequacies as writer or researcher. When a journal is published, editors sit round pointing out all the spelling mistakes that have been missed. And if someone writes well enough to get published in the national press, his or her colleagues will ignore any reference to the fact that important information has been disseminated, instead gleefully pointing out one or two omissions for which there probably wouldnt have been room anyway. Why does this happen? Partly, I think, for reasons of power it is an excellent way of keeping people particularly those younger and brighter than us - busy, occupied and therefore unthreatening. But it also happens by default. This negative writing culture has been around for years and not enough people have sat down to work out whether there is a better way of doing this writing thing. There is, and here are some suggestions. Keep it in perspective. The number of criticisms people can make about your writing is not a sensible measure of success. As the American humorist James Thurber famously wrote: Dont get it right, get it written. Negotiate before writing. Many of the difficulties that arise once the first draft has been written do so because all those involved still have to agree what its all about. With any major piece of writing, make sure that all those involved agree, preferably in writing, on what you are trying to say, to whom and how you will judge your success. Encourage balanced feedback. Try to encourage a culture in which those who are asked to comment on writing are expected to say what they think works and what they think needs changing. They should not be encouraged to go through the text in nit-picking details and any red pens used for this purpose should be destroyed. Look for the positive. Anyone who writes will make mistakes, and we can always do it better. But the question to keep asking is this: has our writing achieved the goal we set out to achieve? All else is noise.
|
|||
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
||||